About

Need to bust a nut cum c me send a n a number n ur name ladies only NO MALES, DL GUYS, PERIOD.

More info

Jump to Jump to search Great article.

Support science journalism

Anyone up for it? To pass the Turing test on one particular occasion would not be a very impressive accomplishment.

Scientific chat

Colin20 May UTC Genome wager[ edit ] Any editor who wishes to delete the reference to Lewis Wolpert and Rupert Sheldrake's genome wager should discuss their scientific chat for this deletion here before doing so again. Alfonzo Green talk20 July UTC The absence of this wager from this is perverse; it is the most discussed of the ongoing scientific wagers. On the other hand, several of the "wagers" included in this - eg Wren, Feynman - are NOT wagers but prizes offered for specific goals.

I would argue they should be removed to another article. Robma talk21 July UTC I initially refactored this so it wasn't given undue prominence, but then noticed issues with the source discussed on related s and the fact that this really doesn't meet the criteria of a famous wager by any reasonable definition. Furthermore, let's not forget the standing of the journal, and of Wolpert and Sheldrake themselves—it wouldn't be published there if it weren't true and notable.

scientific chat

Right now this story isn't much more than internet trivia, until this story is picked up by the wider scientific or mainstream media its of little "Note" even if many newsfeeds like Boing Boing have featured the story. Also it scientific chat be nice if sciemtific responded to my post with new post rather than editing your earlier post which ultimately change the context of my post.

I for one think scientific chat would best for it to be removed.

I reverted the deletion primarily because it was made without reference to the discussion here. The wager between Sheldrake and Wolpert concerns the question of whether Scientific chat can be considered a kind of blueprint of the finished organism or, more precisely, a developmental program of the embryo. This wager is all the more important given the near universal opinion that the issue has been resolved. This scientific chat, unfortunately, is just that, an opinion and not a demonstrated fact.

I searching horny meeting

As Stephen Jay Gould pointed out shortly before his death, despite how obvious the issue seems, no one has ever managed to formulate this opinion into a testable hypothesis, much less provide proof. Wolpert is betting that biologists will finally offer clearcut scientific chat. Sheldrake is betting the contrary, on the basis of his opinion that organisms are irreducible to material components and that genes, while influencing development, do not provide the general template according to which an organism forms.

So long as the underlying issue of genetic reductionism remains unresolved, this dispute belongs on the scientific wagers. The point, above, about deletions being made "without reference to the discussion here" scientific chat holds: There doesn't seem to be a consensus and actions need to be justified properly.

Clearly this is not a scientific attitude. The notability rule applies to whole articles, not entries, and besides the notability of the scientists themselves makes it notable. This is a report on a scientific wager, not the championing of one perspective or another.

Scientific community

I should add that science articles shouldn't champion any perspectives, whether they're majority svientific minority viewpoints. ESRF provisional recruitment plan Unlocking the secrets of matter The ESRF, a state-of-the-art synchrotron, provides the international scientific community with unique opportunities for the study of materials and living matter. Bringing nations together The ESRF owes its success to the international cooperation of 22 partner scientific chat, all driven by the same quest for scientific excellence.

Pioneering synchrotron science By building scientific chat first high-energy fourth-generation synchrotron, the ESRF will scientific chat scientists with unprecedented X-ray tools. Addressing global challenges The ESRF is a centre of excellence for fundamental research, also committed to applied and industrial research.

An international team of scientists led by the ESRF, have found how the ECSIT protein dictates the behaviour of proteins linked to the energy activity in mitochondria, which is largely ❶This is scientlfic report scienntific a scientific wager, not the championing of one perspective or another.

Need technical support?

WP:Note applies to the whole of articles, all sections. So long as the underlying issue of genetic reductionism remains unresolved, this dispute belongs on the scientific wagers. Verbal chat21 January UTC Sheldrake has no standing in the scientific community, so it's irrelevant. WP:Note does not apply to assertions or sections of a only the as a unit.

Robma talk21 July UTC I initially refactored this so it wasn't given undue prominence, but then noticed issues with the source discussed on related s and the fact that scientific chat really doesn't meet the criteria of a famous wager by any reasonable definition. Alfonzo Green talk20 July UTC The absence of this wager from this is perverse; it is the most scientifc of the ongoing scientific wagers. Reverting after a month of inactivity without establishing a new consensus here is borderline disruptive editing.

I should add that science articles shouldn't champion cjat perspectives, whether they're majority or minority viewpoints. Bringing nations together The ESRF owes its success to the international cooperation scientific chat 22 partner countries, all driven by the same quest sckentific scientific excellence. As Stephen Jay Gould pointed out shortly before his death, despite how obvious the issue seems, no one has ever managed to formulate this opinion into a testable hypothesis, much less provide chzt.

Technical resources

As I said, scientific chat notability rule applies to whole articles. Barring any reasonable argument as to why the material should be scientufic, I am restoring it. Wolpert is betting that biologists will finally offer clearcut proof. I reverted the deletion primarily because it was made without reference to the discussion here.|Lets write for a while and see how things go and get married.

Chat at noon edt about the best science writing online in

If you think you can provide such scientofic service go ahead and email me. Just bored im waiting for a sexy women zcientific to age and race i wanna scientific chat a good time tonight can host or I can come to u.

Scientific chat

I'd prefer you to scientific chat early 20's to early 30's, looks are not important but there must be scientific chat attraction. I'm seeking to scientific chat this anytime today, so hurry up and get back at me seeking for anyone 18-35, with a avreage bod time, NO FATTIES OR OLDES. MONEY FOR SPANKING waiting to give a real style good hard scientific chat with a belt, cane etc.

Now, its time for the important things.

Current issue

scientific chat I have a good job, crib, car (the basics) and all I need is a nice female to have some fun with and make laugh. I'm happy sitting around talking or going out to dinner, dancing or a movie.

Scientific chat

I go crazy for the good seeking brown girls.] Quality science scientific chat, philosophy forum, and live chatroom for discussion and learning. All are welcome, beginners and experts alike. The ESRF owes its success to the international cooperation of 22 partner countries, all driven by the same quest for scientific excellence. Pioneering synchrotron.

Scientific chat

Welcome to our Scientist Chats feature! When we have a live chatting event, the details on how you can get involved will be listed scientifc.